It matters what you do with a tax refund before filing bankruptcy

You just got a few thousand dollars from your tax refund and you want to know what to do with it. You know you will likely be filing for bankruptcy in the near future because you can’t keep up on your bills. Does it matter what you do with your tax refund? Yes it does.

If a parent, or child has been helping you out, you may want to pay them back from the tax refund. Or maybe your car is on its last leg and you want to buy a new one.

But what you do with your refund might matter. If you pay back your relative, your bankruptcy trustee may contact them and demand that they pay it back – to the trustee to divide among your creditors.

If you are thinking that bankruptcy may be in your future, before you spend your refund check, speak with a bankruptcy attorney. That’s the only way to be sure that your refund will be used in a way that will benefit you the most.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Practical tips | Comments closed

Why fees for bankruptcies vary

Bankruptcy isn’t free — not even close. If you’re nose deep in debt, that may sound like a cruel hoax, but that is the reality that has to be dealt with. The actual cost of filing, however, can vary from place to place and from law office to law office.

Attorney Susan Robicsek, who practices in North Carolina, has written a nice piece explaining why. Among her reasons:

* Pricing a bankruptcy case “is not the same as purchasing a Nintendo Wii.” In other words, the case itself isn’t a fungible commodity, and there is no reason for bankruptcy clients to be charged for more services than they need.

* You don’t necessarily want the cheapest lawyer in town. Low price may be a sign of efficiency. On the other hand, it may also be a sign of inexperience, cutting corners, or even desperation. You don’t want to buy in to the latter.

* Location counts: you can’t judge the cost of a Lawrence or Haverhill bankruptcy case against New York City or Montana. Access to the court, overhead, and some filing requirements will make the total price different everywhere.

* Do-it-yourself can cost you. Of course, it saves in the short haul, but soon you’ll be before a judge alone, possibly with a mistake worth thousands of dollars on the line. Most people find its usually better to pay for help and sleep at night.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Practical tips | Comments closed

Don’t take the bankruptcy financial management course? Why one debtor didn’t want to

In order to get a discharge in a consumer bankruptcy case, the 2005 version of the bankruptcy code requires debtors to go to school — that is take and finish a 2 hour course on “financial management” (what used to be called family budgeting), and file the course certificate with the court. No certificate, no discharge.

But Florida bankruptcy lawyer Jonathon Alper has run across a case where a debtor didn’t want to take that course.

Usually debtor’s who file Chapter 7 cases are “locked out” and can’t file chapter 7 again for eight years. But the lock out is effective only if they get a discharge in the first case.

So what happens if a debtor unexpectedly gets hit with a large unsecured debt right after the case is filed?

The Florida lawyers figured out a clever strategy: don’t take the financial management course. That way, the court eventually will dismiss the case without issuing a discharge. The debtor is then free, in theory, at least to re-file under Chapter 7 and include the large debt. When the case is re-filed, the debtor WILL take his course, and then should get a discharge in due course.

Whether this gambit would actually work in the Massachusetts or New Hampshire bankruptcy courts is any one’s guess, but I thought it was a clever bit of strategizing by my Florida counterparts.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Practical tips | Comments closed

Massachusetts lawyer sentenced for bankruptcy fraud

A Massachusetts lawyer will serve three years in federal prison for bankruptcy and tax fraud, after being sentenced in federal court yesterday.

The Boston Globe reported that James Gregson received a thirty six month sentence in a case that had its roots in winning lottery tickets. Gregson, who had a law practice in Saugus, purchased two winning tickets from separate lottery players, paying them a flat cash fee for the right to collect their prizes over time.

There is nothing wrong per se with that arrangement, which is actually a common one among lottery winners who would rather have a lump sum of cash now to meet some pressing need. Where the attorney apparently went astray was in his aversion to declaring the arrangement on government forms: according to the prosecutors, he failed to report the income he collected on his 2003 federal tax return, and also failed to report that he owned the tickets when he filed for personal bankruptcy in 2005.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

Everything you ever wanted to know about the tax consequenses of debt forgiveness in bankruptcy

Forgiving debt is basically good, right? I mean its a big part of the Lord’s prayer, just for starters.

But wait until lawyers get a hold of the idea.

This time it is tax attorneys that get to twirl their moustaches in the manner of Snidely Whiplash, and play the bad guy.

In the twisted world of tax law, having your debt forgiven can sometimes lead to a bigger income tax bill for you. Or sometimes not, this is law, after all, and “it all depends.”

Kent Anderson, a bankruptcy lawyer in Oregon, has written a nice piece that explains the ins and outs of debt forgiveness as it applies to taxes and bankruptcy. If you would like a quick primer on the subject, by all means, check it out!

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Taxes | Comments closed

Leaning: how quick do banks react to bankruptcies?

If you are not making payments on a mortgage, a second mortgage, or some other type of secured loan, like a car payment, and you file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, how long will it take for the bank to request a chance to do a foreclosure?

Like most legal questions, the answer can be given in two words: “It depends.” But first, a primer. If you are in bankruptcy (with a few exceptions), a lender can’t just do a foreclosure or repossession. They need to ask the bankruptcy judge for permission first. This is done through filing a motion for “relief” from the automatic stay of proceedings that protects you, the debtor. And by the way, this relief isn’t free: the Court, besieged by these types of cases, now charges creditors $150 just to file them with the clerk.

Well, how soon will a lender typically file for relief? Right now I’m seeing all kinds of responses from lenders ranging from just a few days after your case is filed to “never.”

But I think I’m on to a clue: I think the banks, at least some of them, are “leaning.”

Meaning that if the property is in a desirable neighborhood, the chances for quick action increases. An ordinary neighborhood (or worse), and the interest just isn’t there.

File a bankruptcy case for a nice home in Andover? You won’t wait too long to hear from the bank about a motion for relief.

File a bankruptcy case with an ordinary (or worse) home in Lawrence or Haverhill, and it might be a while before they get to it.

Now officially, banks are in the lending business, not the real estate selling business. On paper, they shouldn’t really WANT to own any more property anywhere.

But with the slight uptick in the economy, and the real estate business at least not in complete free-fall, a lot of leaning is starting to go on. So if you have a nice house in a nice neighborhood, be prepared to try to keep up on those mortgage payments at all costs!

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Foreclosure, Real estate | Comments closed

Methuen and Salem escape Borders bankruptcy cuts again

The Borders Group book and music store chain, which filed for bankruptcy in February, is trimming more stores to try to stay alive. Twenty-eight more outlets are now slated for closure, including two in Massachusetts. But for now, the Borders at the Loop in Methuen and the smaller outlet at the Mall at Rockingham Park in Salem, N.H. have escaped the bankruptcy cuts.

The additional stores that will be closed in Massachusetts are in Braintree and Shrewsbury. A total of 228 stores nationwide will now be shuttered.

 

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

Can a bankruptcy trustee tell you where to do your banking?

Can a bankruptcy trustee force you to do business with a certain bank after a case is filed?

In Massachusetts, the answer appears to be “no,” but it’s not for lack of trying.

In a Chapter 13 case, if the debtor is self-employed or runs a small business, they are required to establish a new bank account for the business as of the date of the filing. The checks drawn on this account are supposed to clearly indicate that the account is for a “debtor in possession” and also show the docket number of the particular case.

That is because a Chapter 13 debtor IS a “debtor in possession” — they get to retain all of their property, including business interests during the case.

No problem so far, but can the Chapter 13 trustee actually order the debtor to create this account at a certain bank (or from a list of pre-approved banks)? That’s what the trustee tried to do in the Seger case, decided recently in Worcester. The debtors ran a dance academy and wanted to continue doing business with the Leominster Credit Union. The trustee wanted to force them to switch to a bank on the approved list used in Chapter 11 business cases.

But bankruptcy judge Melvin Hoffman ruled that Chapters 11 and 13 are worded differently, and that there is no requirement under Chapter 13 to make any business switch banks.

Incidentally, if you are an individual NOT in business who files a Chapter 13 case (e.g. you have a salaried job) none of this applies, and you don’t typically even have to open a new account.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Chapter 13 | Comments closed

What happens if you can’t pay your mortgage?

A common question people ask is what happens if they are simply unable to make regular mortgage payments?

First off, if you are able to make the payments, by all means do so.

But people who know the end of the rope is near may consider “strategic defaults” — purposely not making payments in order to get the bank’s attention. That it will.

What is unclear is what happens next: the bank’s reaction is completely unpredictable.

I have seen people two years behind in payments and foreclosure papers still have not been filed.

But sometimes it goes the other way: eager banks who begin the process just a month or so after you get behind. But in general, this hasn’t been happening, because of the growing problem of “shadow inventory.”

Shadow inventory, simply put, is bank-owned property that is so stacked up that they are having trouble even marketing it. Banks aren’t really in the real estate business, they are in the money lending business. One more house added to the hundreds or thousands they are trying to sell is not what they are looking for.

Deeds in lieu of foreclosure and short sales come in to the picture at this point, and may be a way to get out of your predicament, but at a price: you may still be responsible for the shortfall in the likely case that your house does not recoup the loan money. You also could possibly be liable to income taxes if a bank “forgives” part of a loan.

Bankruptcy comes in to play if you either wish to avoid paying a deficiency notice after a foreclosure (these Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases are common in the Lawrence area right now), or if you have a second mortgage that is completely under water. In the latter case, the second mortgage can often be stripped with a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Foreclosure, Real estate | Comments closed

No spousal equity in bankruptcy for Massachusetts tax refunds

I’ve written several posts here on how tax returns are handled in a consumer bankruptcy case, but now there is a new twist, at least for married couples living in Massachusetts.

Got a tax refund coming? If you are married, think the bankruptcy court will divide it 50-50% if one spouse files for bankruptcy? Well, you need to think again.

Actually, in the Hundley case, the bankruptcy court didn’t really know what to think — the case got appealed all the way up to the First Circuit Court of Appeals (one step away from the Supreme Court), and even they punted, and asked the Massachusetts supreme court to answer this question: who owns a joint tax refund?

The Supreme Judicial Court didn’t give an absolute answer, bur instructed what not to do: assume a 50-50 split. Those laws, it said, apply only to divorce proceedings, and this couple has not filed for divorce.

The problem started when the married Hundleys were about to receive a $93,000 income tax refund. The reason the refund was so large was because of losses declared by the husband’s business — which unfortunately meant that he, although not his wife, had to file for personal bankruptcy as well.

Mr. Hundley did the logical thing and declared half of the refund as an asset in his bankruptcy, figuring the other half belonged to his non-filing wife. The trustee thought otherwise, however, and sought the whole refund. The round of litigation and appeals soon followed.

So where does this leave us? As is typical in legal matters, in a confusing and unchartered place. It looks like both the Hundleys and you and me too will have to evaluate each individual case according to its own facts in order to

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed
Call now: (978) 975 - 2608