Baseball team on the auction block

There is no live baseball tonight, with MLB players still enjoying the All-Star break, but that doesn’t mean that there can’t be any action off the field.

The Texas Rangers’ bankruptcy case has taken a couple of twists, and that could lead to the team being up for auction as soon as early August.

One of the stumbling points was whether the team could properly be sold to the second highest bidder. Major League Baseball, which likes to keep tight control over who owns their franchises, backed that procedure, which would have given them veto power over the top bidder, but the creditors predictably howled like a stuck pig.

It appears that the judge has sort of split the baby; he’s allowing a second-high bid to potentially stand, but forcing the leading bidders — a group that includes rubber-armed fireballer and former Texas Ranger Nolan Ryan — to come up with an opening “stalking horse” bid by August 4th. The judge also determined that any later bids must be raised in at least $20M dollar increments.

The Rangers are the only MLB team in bankruptcy; they also have the largest division lead of any team at the All-Star break, have recently traded with the Mariners for pitching ace Cliff Lee, and are in town to play the Red Sox at Fenway Park starting Thursday night.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

“My house is in foreclosure, when do I go to court?”

“My house is in foreclosure, when do I do to court?” A reasonable question, but also a trick question.

If you live in Massachusetts your house can be sold at a foreclosure auction without you ever seeing the inside of a courthouse. Indeed, most are.

Massachusetts has a fairly lengthy, complicated foreclosure process, but it doesn’t involve a lot of in-court work. At one point in the process, a complaint needs to be filed against you, either at the Land Court in Boston, or the Superior Court in the County where you live (the one on Appleton Street in Lawrence next to City Hall, for many of my clients).

While you could file a response to this complaint and get a hearing in the land or superior court, this isn’t a practical course of action for most people, and it is seldom done. What is a practical response if you are trying to save you house is to see a bankruptcy attorney and see if you would qualify for a Chapter 13 case; that can allow you to solve the missed-payments problem over a course of several years.

If you have been served with a warning that your property is “in foreclosure” don’t just sit around waiting for a court date to arrive! You can call me (978) 975-2608, or you can call another attorney, but make sure you talk to a professional and find out what your options really are.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Chapter 13, Foreclosure | Comments closed

Americans’ credit scores hitting new lows

A recent survey has found that the poor economy is causing the credit ratings of individual Americans to sink to all time lows.

As of late April, more than 25% of Americans have a FICO score below 599.

Paradoxically, the number of people with perfect scores of 800-850(sounds like the SAT, doesn’t it? ) has also been creeping up; almost 18% are in this stratosphere, up form a historical average of about 13%.

And even folks with scores in the middle are getting squeezed. Florida mortgage broker Ritch Workman relates the following tale to Eileen Connolly of the Associated Press: “A customer with a score of 679 recently walked away from buying a house because he could not get the best interest rate on a $100,000 mortgage. Had his score been 680, the rate he was offered would have been a half-percent lower. The difference was only about $31 per month, but over a 30-year mortgage would have added up to more than $11,000.”

“There was nothing derogatory on his credit report,” Workman said of the customer. He had, however, recently gotten an auto loan, which likely lowered his score.

How does all this scoring affect those in need of bankruptcy? The best advice I can give is that being four months behind on a loan, being in foreclosure, or filing a bankruptcy case all have about the same affect of your score.

Filing the bankruptcy, however, has the advantage of wiping away most of the underlying problem, which allows your FICO scores to start climbing again, typically in about a year for a debtor who becomes scrupulous about paying bills going forward.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

NFL quarterback bankrupt

Former Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Mark Brunell has filed for bankruptcy, according to an article by Texas law firm Allmand and Lee.

It appears that Brunell has filed under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code, listing $5.5 million in assets and $24.7 million in debts.

Brunell has earned more than $50 million in his sports career, but along with his wife, still owes almost $3 million on the couple’s residence.

Brunell played for many years in Jacksonville, and earned a Super Bowl ring just last February for his role as a backup QB with the New Orleans Saints. His bankruptcy estate — fair game for creditors — includes that Super Bowl ring and also three Rose Bowl rings from his college days.

Brunell’s misfortunes appear to be tied principally to poorly timed real estate investments, and the nationwide crash in property values.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

The difference between a bankruptcy discharge and a dismissal

Dismissed and discharged. These two terms are at the opposite ends of the scale of results in bankruptcy, yet they are often confused.

A debtor gets a discharge and is relieved of the legal liability for the dischargeable debts in the bankruptcy case.

A dismissal means the bankruptcy case was terminated short of the discharge. It could be dismissed at the request of the debtor or upon the motion of the trustee or the court. But it means that the case has been close without a discharge.

A case in which a discharge is entered will be closed by the court when all the legally necessary steps have been met, such as the trustee’s report.

Generally speaking, if you are filing a typical consumer Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, you want to get a discharge, and want to avoid a dismissal.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Practical tips | Comments closed

Lenders are often slow to act even when you file for bankruptcy

The automatic stay is the hallmark of bankruptcy, so when the judge lifts the stay to permit a lender to foreclose, we tend to think the curtain has come down on our client as homeowner.  Well, maybe not, or at least, not yet.

In some cases, the road to foreclosure seems to be a wandering path rather than an expressway.  Case in point:  I have seen cases where the notice of default, (the first step in the statutory foreclosure process) was not recorded until six months after relief from the automatic stay was granted by a bankruptcy judge.

Those six months are months the clients lived payment free in the house.  They continue to try to wend their way through the lender’s loan modification process.  Even if they aren’t successful in getting a modification, it will be at least another 4 months before the lender can hold a foreclosure sale.

If you are caught up in a foreclosure situation, don’t assume that you must leave your home immediately. Some folks have been able to live effectively rent-free for many, many months, even those who have filed relatively simple Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Foreclosure | Comments closed

Thinking about a debt relief firm instead of bankruptcy? Better read this!

If you have been thinking about doing business with one of those “debt-relief” firms that are advertising everywhere lately, you really need to read this New York Times article first: “Peddling Relief, Firms put Debtors in a Bigger Hole.

If you are looking instead for real solutions, give me a call instead (if you live in Massachusetts or southern New Hampshire, that is). I’m a real person, and will talk to you on the phone about whether bankruptcy or any other type of option, like re-negotiating loans, will work for you. I’ll give you a rough idea about how much it costs, and I’ll meet you in person without charging you anything until you decide whether to hire me. I work on Route 114 in North Andover and my phone number is (978) 975-2608.

Doug Beaton.

(Photo by Steve Hebert, New York Times)

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed

Loan Modifications on Underwater Homes: just delaying the inevitable?

You’ve just spent months trying to get a loan modification on the mortgage for your house, and today you found out you got accepted into their program.

Congratulations!

Or maybe not.

What if your house isn’t worth as much as the loan, even the modified loan? We call that being underwater. Blub. Blub. Blub. No fun.

And don’t kid yourself, underwater houses are just as common in Andover, Methuen, and Windham as they are in Lawrence or Haverhill; its a national problem affecting everyone up and down society’s ladder.

Lots of loan modifications work by putting your arrears onto the back of the loan, giving you a lower interest rate (sometimes temporarily), and extending the length of the loan, say from 30 years to 40 years. Presto, this will result in lower payments (sometimes temporarily). But it actually makes the amount of principal owed increase, meaning you are deeper underwater than before.

If property values don’t increase rapidly, you are essentially chained to the home, and won’t be able to get away from it without a short sale or foreclosure down the road.

Don’t kid yourself, this is no form of investment. Basically all you have is a place to live in right now, at a price you presumably can afford right now. Which really isn’t very different from filing a bankruptcy case now (which avoids short sales or any deficiencies from foreclosures), and renting for a few years, while watching to see if market conditions improve.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Foreclosure | Comments closed

How much disposable income should a debtor pay in to a Chapter 13 bankruptcy?

One of the longstanding rules of Chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code is that debtors seeking relief under this chapter must turn over all their “disposable income” — i.e., what’s left over after paying the basic bills — to a bankruptcy trustee every month for the length of their plan, which can run as long as five years.

That’s been the rule for a long time, even before the controversial 2005 changes that made the bankruptcy laws “tougher.”

But is it a good rule? Recently there have been some suggestions that dedicating all the disposable income to trustee payments (which then get distributed to creditors according to a set formula) might not be the best way to go.

Think about saving, for instance. Most would agree, that going forward, a debtor’s best chance for financial success involves setting aside a portion of their income in a disciplined plan. Debtors are now required to take, at their own expense, post-filing financial management courses that tell them this in so many words. But the Chapter 13 rules effectively prohibit saving, by directing any spare change into the hands of creditors.

Its probably not a 100% sure-thing, but a change in the rules that allowed Chapter 13 debtors to build a modest nest egg might even help the cause of creditors, by providing an incentive for more financially strapped people to choose Chapter 13 as their bankruptcy option.

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Chapter 13 | Comments closed

Wells Fargo not allowed to freeze bank accounts when a Chapter 7 case is filed

An interesting case emanating from the western states involves a court clamping down on Wells Fargo for illegally violating the bankruptcy court’s automatic stay protections in many consumer Chapter 7 cases.

A recent ruling from a bankruptcy appellate panel in the Ninth Circuit, which covers most of the West, found that Wells Fargo was obtaining lists of every debtor in the country who filed a Chapter 7, and comparing the names with their account holders. Whenever there was a match, Wells Fargo would put a “freeze” on the account, not letting the debtors have access to their funds. Then they would send a form letter to the bankruptcy trustee, asking what should be done with the money. If the trustee didn’t write back, they just kept the funds indefinitely.

The appellate judges held that Wells Fargo’s national policy of freezing accounts violates the automatic stay; they notes that the debtors in the case in question had actually requested that Wells Fargo return the money to them, and had declared part of the account exempt on their bankruptcy schedules.

The court stated that, since no instructions were forthcoming, Wells Fargo was under an obligation to do something–either release the funds to the trustee; release the funds to the debtors after demand was made by the debtors or seek direction from the bankruptcy court. Wells Fargo did none of those things.

There aren’t too many Wells Fargo bank branches in New England yet, so this decision may not directly affect many people filing Chapter 7 cases in New Hampshire or Massachusetts. But keep an eye out for what your bank does when you file a case. If you come across a bank that “freezes” accounts automatically like Wells Fargo did, let me know about it!

 

By Doug Beaton

Posted in Bankruptcy News | Comments closed
Call now: (978) 975 - 2608